Autism and aluminium: The din of silence

Sometimes silence can speak volumes. In December 2017, we published in a highly reputable journal our research suggesting a link between human exposure to aluminium and the aetiology of autism.

The research showed that individuals who died with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) had very high levels of aluminium in their brain tissue. However, the standout observation was not necessarily the amount of aluminium but its predominant location in non-neuronal cells and especially microglia.

However, the standout observation was not necessarily the amount of aluminium but its predominant location in non-neuronal cells and especially microglia

In an interview immediately following presentation of this research, I expressed my opinion that these new data had forced me to change my mind about a putative role for aluminium in autism.

I was aware of the emotive nature of our research and especially as I knew that it would bring into focus a possible link between aluminium adjuvants in vaccines and autism, though this link was not discussed in the paper. However, I am not sure that I was prepared for the nature of the response to our research. Perhaps the most deafening response has been the tsunami of silence perpetuated by all mainstream media, almost globally! Compliant with this has been my own University that did not even deem the research ‘worthy’ of a mention in its own weekly news outlet. When one considers the nature of much of the science that makes headline news one is left wondering what it is about a link between aluminium and autism that is not deemed newsworthy. Perhaps mainstream media were unaware of the research.

Actually, it was covered by The Mail Online, where it was shared 60K times, and to-date it has also been delivered to 2M twitter accounts and viewed at the paper’s publisher’s website more than 70K times. Clearly, social media is aware of our research and I am grateful to all those who shared it. There have been other indicators of awareness of the research and these are examples of the downside of open access delivery of scientific research. While I remain completely in support of the need to communicate scientific research as widely as possible, I was not prepared for the vitriol, largely anonymous, which accompanied our publication. I have been elucidating upon the potential dangers of the aluminium age for 34 years now but I have never before had my life threatened openly. I can only assume that our research has weighed very heavily on the toes of those who will not counter the possibility that not all vaccines are 100% safe.

There have also been criticisms of the journal for publishing our research, of the brain bank for providing us with tissues and of the research methods used in obtaining the data. All of these ‘criticisms’ share in common the superfluous nature of critical debate which seems to pervade present society.

There have also been criticisms of the journal for publishing our research, of the brain bank for providing us with tissues and of the research methods used in obtaining the data. All of these ‘criticisms’ share in common the superfluous nature of critical debate which seems to pervade present society.

If any of the individuals responsible for these comments had spent just a small amount of time reading the paper, researching the background of the authors and investigating the process of ethical review then they would be aware that their criticisms were groundless. Speak first and think later seems to have been the critic’s mantra, at least for this research.

Our research on aluminium and autism took two years of extremely hard and dedicated work to complete. While the response to it through social media in the main has been gratifying, the vitriol of some individuals has been difficult, as have the decisions by mainstream media and the scientific establishment to ignore the findings. The silence in this case has not been ‘golden’ it has been deafening and it has only served to reinforce that which is of burgeoning realisation that we are already suffering the consequences of the tyranny of the aluminium age.

Professor Chris Exley

Professor Chris Exley

Professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry Keele University
Honorary Professor, UHI Millennium Institute
Group Leader - Bioinorganic Chemistry Laboratory at Keele
Professor Chris Exley

Latest posts by Professor Chris Exley (see all)

Share:  

More in this category

Leave a Reply

7 Comments on "Autism and aluminium: The din of silence"

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Noel Thomas
Member

Once again, excellence and integrity have to be their own rewards – in the short term.
The silence of the media is an expression of the threat that this work poses to the media’s paymasters.
Without pharma advertising many media outlets would collapse.
Therefore they use their most powerful weapon, the ability not to mention, not to publicise, what it is that threatens their income and power.

coralj
Member

You raise excellent yet alarming points.

coralj
Member
Dr Exley you and your teams research have done us all a huge favour. And obviously the industries negative response is indicative of their fear of loss of revenue through decreased vaccine sales, or law suits , or by having to actually do the full research on vaccines that should have been done (as for all other drugs ) in the first place. Your paper was excellent. Have no fear of that. Please keep doing your valuable research because the world needs it. And please keep safe. Any threats made against you need to be taken seriously. In this day… Read more »
Ljcox
Member

Thank you for your amazing work! Please do not let the vitriol of those who would silence the truth about our children to cause you to stop. As we progress to greater numbers of damaged children ( it is estimated by 2025 1 in 2 children born will be diagnosed autistic) eventually science you and others have done will have to be recognized.

whiteandnerdy
Member

Hi Chris,

I have a question. How do the alu level compare to relevant controls?

Thanks,
W&N

Sharwan
Member
The writer adds: Speak first and think later seems to have been the critic’s mantra, at least for this research. To me this is a positive sign when someone starts thinking after what he does as there are many people who never think at all after committing a mistake. I would therefore suggest the author to continue doing research in this important field and do not bother about the threats. As regards aluminum in relation to autism, a pertinent question is: do all autistic brains contain excess of aluminium or only a few percent of them exhibit that ? I… Read more »
Chris Exley
Member
Good points. Unfortunately there is no way to image or measure aluminium in human brain tissue in vivo. I agree that genetic signatures will play a significant role in determining how much aluminium is found in brain tissue and equally where it is found. I am not sure that the MRC or indeed any autism charity would fund such a study. Regarding the removal of aluminium from brain tissue in autism there is already a viable solution (see my blog on this on this site) and we would like to hear about any anecdotal evidence that regular drinking of a… Read more »